Website Performance

Website performance work, measured properly

Performance work should be judged on real user data, not a single lab score. I use both: lab tools to find causes, field data from Search Console to confirm the fix reached actual visitors.

What's included

  • Full performance audit with prioritised fixes
  • Largest Contentful Paint improvement
  • Cumulative Layout Shift elimination
  • Interaction to Next Paint tuning
  • Font, image and script delivery optimisation
  • Caching, compression and CDN setup

Why it matters

Every second of delay costs conversions, and the effect compounds on mobile connections. Performance is one of the few improvements that helps rankings, conversion rate and ad quality scores at the same time.

Working with me

Audit first, always

Nothing gets quoted before I've looked at what exists. You get a written scope with what I'd change, what I'd leave alone, and why.

FAQ

Common questions

Lab score versus field data — which matters?
Field data, which is what Google actually uses. Lab tools are for diagnosis. A perfect lab score with failing field data means the test conditions weren't realistic.
How long before I see results?
Site speed changes immediately. Search Console field data updates on a rolling 28-day window, so ranking effects take longer to become visible.
Next step

Let's talk about what you need built.

Send over the details and I'll come back with honest scope, timeline and cost — no sales call required first.